At the outset, we must consider that those faceless cowards can choose the time, place and even the manner they would carry out an attack. Hence, all preventive measures can only somehow reduce the threat but cannot guarantee total safety.
With said
reality, we must be resilient; that is, capable and always ready to surge back
and restore our lives to normal right after an incident. Never should we allow
terrorists to dictate on us.
In examining the nature of terrorism, we are dealing with a multi-dimensional problem. Discussion is centered mostly on the criminal justice aspects: prevention and punishment. The overriding questions are not technological or legal; they are philosophical and political.
Political considerations form the framework in which the activity of those engaged in terrorism is interpreted. We usually hear people say “A man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter”. Simply stated, terrorism can be held to revolve around one's political point of view and this is the major impediment standing in the path of a universally acceptable definition of the term.
However, regardless of the diversity in our political, religious or social outlook, we should be one in looking at the more important issue. Motivation notwithstanding, the rhetoric of terrorists should not be allowed to conceal their true identity. They are first and foremost, criminals. No doctrine or belief could justify killing helpless, innocent people.
Because of the enormous damage they inflict, there is a misconception that terrorists are big in number and so strong. To the contrary, terrorism is the strategy of the weak, a weapon of those small bands of rascals who are prepared to use violence but who believe that they would lose any contest by sheer strength.
Terrorism is means to an end, not an end in itself. Let alone, terrorism can accomplish nothing in terms of political goals; it can only aim at obtaining a response that will achieve those goals for it. Said another way, terrorist violence is aimed not so much on the target upon which the initial act is committed but to much wider audience who will view and interpret the act.
Brutality and
repression are induced responses that will alienate the government from the
masses, thus set the stage for revolution. In dealing with the problem of
terrorism, paramount is the rule of law and our respect for human rights.
To be able to correctly interpret events, we must clearly distinguish terrorism from an ordinary criminal act. Not all violent incidents, however terrifying, can be categorized as works of terrorists. The political and social objectives which drive terrorists to act give terrorism a character of its own.
Likewise, it is different from regular, as well as guerilla war because in terrorism, innocents are killed deliberately. Its very wickedness makes it a vulnerable strategy.
One possible purpose of a terrorist act is to create strife among the various sectors in a society. Some radicals pull religious verses out of context to suit their objective. But murder has no home in any religious faith. All of the world's major religions preach the values of love, peace, charity and respect for the sanctity of life. Hence, we must not fall into the enemy trap by institutionally faulting religion or its members for the upheaval.
Publicity tends to exaggerate the threats that terrorism pose to society. If we fail to understand its nature, possibility is high that we will make our fears very much greater than the actual threat.
Most of the victims of terrorist violence are innocent bystanders. Obviously
then, terrorists are enemies of the humanity thereby making public support an
essential factor in our war against terror.
Note: Join the war against terror. Please reproduce this hand-out and give to friends and neighbors.
Note: Join the war against terror. Please reproduce this hand-out and give to friends and neighbors.
No comments:
Post a Comment